The DEA is offending Americans by changing their cannabis narrative to “needs more research” while blocking all research

For decades, organizations like NORML have urged the US government to remove state barriers to research only to be bricked by the DEA and FDA.

Despite all of this active campaign by these agencies against the plant, activists have worked tirelessly to legalize it state-to-state, and now 33 states allow some type of cannabis on the books.

This of course also triggered the commercialization of cannabis, which has generated billions in tax revenues in recent years.

However, mass marketing cannabis has some inherent problems. For example, the potency high aims to increase the potency of the plant based on the unfounded belief that “stronger means better”.

The truth is, smoking heavier does not mean smoking better. There are many other factors that are just as important, such as the density of other cannabinoids, terpenoids, and flavonoids.

Nonetheless, the hyper-commercialization of cannabis will cause more cases where people may have adverse reactions to the plant – especially when we are talking about “processed cannabis”.

Because of this, proponents have long urged legitimate science to look at the plant, research it, and create a safety profile based on those studies.

Except that all of the previous studies on cannabis came from a single plant grown with hemp-like weed in Mississippi – thanks to the DEA.

But now that the DEA is losing the battle for its cannabis research stronghold, they are finally “allowing” researchers to source cannabis from different locations.

DEA hypocrisy exposed in 2021!

In a comment from San Antonio, Dante Sorianello, the deputy special agent in charge of the DEA in San Antonio, confirmed that the DEA is opening up more research;

“More tests have opened. And that’s because the federal government’s DEA is taking this a lot more seriously and is looking at this to see what the pros or cons of cannabis are,” says Sorianello

That’s a good thing, but the following sentence sent a shiver of anger down my spine.

“So, as DEA has always said. More research needs to be done. So a good right decision can be made based on science, not emotion, to formulate laws – change laws or keep certain laws the same,” says Sorianello.

WHAT? The DEA always said … but then blocked ALL research for the past five decades.

“Good right decision based on science and not on emotions …”

FUCK YOURSELF!

The Shaffer Commission provided legitimate scientific evidence of the legality of cannabis in 1970 that was ignored and passed laws based not on science but on emotion and propaganda – resulting in the incarceration of millions.

It is rich for the DEA to claim “real science” when they put cannabis in the same category as heroin. The CSA has no real scientific basis. It’s all guesswork, and they funded studies (95% of those studies) to look for the negative effects of cannabis.

This is probably the biggest slap in the face of the American people since Nixon ignored the Shaffer Commission and classified cannabis as a List I substance.

Why these agencies need to be held accountable

Unless you’ve lived under a rock for the past few decades – government agencies often commit cruel acts and no one is released or even imprisoned.

If you don’t believe me, just ask Ted Kaczynski who was part of MK Ultra during the Harvard LSD experiments designed by the CIA to literally destroy a person’s psyche.

Later Kaczynski became “The Unibomber” and all guilt lay with him. Unless it was part of a government experiment that disassembled it so that the researchers who carried out the experiments should also be held responsible for the person’s actions.

Some might say, “Reginald – if that happens, there will be no experiments”, but let me turn the argument around and say, “If a private company brings a defective product onto the market – who is responsible and compelled to pay compensation to those affected to pay? ”

The DEA, in partnership with the FDA, has played an active role in stifling cannabis research, citing each other as the reason they “can’t” open research.

Only now – when they lost the fight against the will of the people, “allow us” to do more research.

These are the things US citizens should be angry about. These are government attitudes that must be eradicated because if this is not controlled, only one truth will be further substantiated.

Welcome to the II-tier system

You will get fired for admitting that you smoke weed and are a White House employee – but if you’re the President’s son, smoke crack and get jobs!

You can suffocate an innocent man as long as you wear a badge and work for the city. You can poison people’s drinking water as long as you have a political stance.

You can steal, attack, threaten, spy, kidnap and a variety of other criminal activities without consequences – as long as you belong to the right “class” of citizens.

For the vast majority of Americans, you fall into second grade – the class where all the rules apply and where you can get decades of jail time for things the “first-class citizen” gets free with Scott.

The sticky end result

I wrote this article furiously because I think the government did a fantastic job of pitting people against people. Race, sex, or any other element of division – they promote it in their media, force it in their narratives, and blame you for everything that goes wrong.

It is time we held them all accountable. It’s time we approached her about her bullshit.

Yes, we need more research! But no, the DEA didn’t always say that – they were exactly the people who got in the way of research. That they can lie so openly tells you only one thing – they think they are smart and you are stupid.

You will be her bitches forever!

Unless, of course, you realize – you have all the power … you just have to organize.

HOW THE GOVERNMENT BLOCKS CANANBIS RESEARCH READ MORE …

NIDA BLOCKS MARIJUANA RESEARCH

HOW NIDA IS BLOCKING WEED RESEARCH AGAIN, CLICK HERE!

OR..

BLOCKING MARIJUANA RESEARCH

DO YOU WANT TO PROOF THE GOVERNMENT BLOCKING MARIJUANA RESEARCH?

Post a comment:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *