Large institutions gather around medical marijuana

Data and the medical community recognized the advantages of medical marijuana – and they make it clear to the federal government.

It has become a great help in the treatment of millions of patients, but concerns from the federal government have triggered concerns. Now large institutions are gathering about medical marijuana to protect those who need the most urgent. It is strong support for the protection of the medical marijuana protection with more than a dozen celebrities respected national organizations who ask the congress to maintain the protective measures of the Federal Medical Marijuana patients. In a letter recently sent to the congress leaders, the groups asked the legislators to preserve a key change that prevents the Ministry of Justice from pursuing individuals and providers in accordance with state medical cannabis laws.

Relatives: The connection between country music and cannabis

The letter was submitted when the congress takes into account the annual law on trade, justice, science and related agencies (CJS), which is known to the long-term change from Rohrabacher-Blouleauer (also known as a medical marijuana protection application). The amendment adopted in 2014 prohibits the use of federal funds to disrupt state medical marijuana programs -a crucial sign for patients, doctors and providers in 38 states, Washington DC and several US territories in which medical cannabis is legal.

The organizations behind the letter speak in the name of patients, members of the health professions, civil rights lawyers and municipalities who deal with public health and access to care. They fear that the change would endanger the health and legal security of millions of Americans who rely on medical cannabis to treat diseases that range from chronic pain and PTSD to cancer and epilepsy. While the cannabis industry has long been committed to this protection, the new pressure from the mainstream signals that non-cannabis organizations ensure an expansion consensus that access to medical marijuana is preserved.

“This is not a political or commercial topic for our community – it is a medical,” said Laura Weidner, Vice President of Government Relationships in Epilepsy Foundation. “We have families who rely on medical cannabis when all other treatments have failed. Removing these protective measures puts life and livelihood in danger.”

The letter calls on the congress to maintain the change in the impending law on trade, justice, science and related agencies (CJS). It is also recommended to permanently shape these protective measures, which eliminates the uncertainty of annual renewals and the shielding of law -aged patients and providers against sudden legal threats.

Relatives: cannabis is much better and safer than a honey package

While 38 countries and several US areas have legalized medical marijuana, this remains a substance of the schedule I. The organizations argue that the undermining of the state programs by not only violating the implementation of the federal government, but also disturbing the treatment plans for patients with diseases such as cancer, epilepsy, PTSD and multipler sclerosis.

Some of the groups have worked on questions such as the health of veterans, disability and public health – not in cannabis policy. Their commitment signals that access to medical marijuana has become a main concern of those who work for communities in need of protection.

Complete list of non-can-Cannabis organizations that signed the letter

1. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)

2. American Nurses Association

3. American Osteopathic Association

4. Epilepsy Foundation

5. Human Rights Watch

6. National Organization for Women

7. National multiple sclerosis Society

8. National association of social workers

9. Veterans for common sense

10. National disability law network

11. National health law program

12. Center for disability rights

13. AIDS United

14. The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinsons Research

15. Autistic self -confection network

These organizations have little in common politically or professionally – except for a common concern that in need of protection, Americans in need of protection could lose access to legally sanctioned medical treatments. Her uniform voice sends a strong message to the congress: the protection of patients is not a niche problem, but a national.