Is Social Media Censorship Helping Develop Modern Reefer Madness?

Some cannabis users have certainly struggled with high doses of edibles. At the same time, others don’t experience much of an effect even after consuming high doses of active THC. In any case, jokes about THC overconsumption are commonplace on social media. But with censorship and social engineering hanging over us all like a dark cloud that no VPN can survive, is the frequency of certain content really innocent?

Ban hammers and shadowbans are often imposed on cannabis content creators. Scientists with PhDs in biochemistry, pharmacy or horticulture and the rest of the fields need to be careful with their social media accounts. And anyone who markets a product has to overcome many loopholes when it comes to education about cannabis. Some content seems to flow more freely on certain feeds — but is money the only fat?

Before Facebook, there was LifeLog

Recall that Facebook shares a unique story involving at least one government organization’s use of personal information. That said, Thefacebook.com was born for use among university students a day after A proposed program has been shelved for consideration. This program, known as LifeLog, was developed by the United States Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. LifeLog was designed to track the lives of the nation’s citizens. However, it is not known if Facebook has any connection to this program. Or if the site’s founder, Mark Zuckerberg, simply stole his original idea from DARPA and gave the concept an innocent twist. In any case, it was a big turnout for US government intelligence — and for Zuckerberg.

And so it becomes clear why Elon Musk, in his position, might want to buy Twitter before attempting to use corporate acquisition strategies to shut down Facebook and its new parent company Meta. Of course, the second half of the plan might be nothing more than tunnel dreams for the eccentric to use as a hoax. A stream of savvy social media exposures were used to boost investments and cheat on his stock-rich fortune – from psychedelics to space.

Creating negative cannabis stories on social media, a digital reefer craze

LinkedIn still offers a safe and supportive space for cannabis users. While Twitter still functions as a largely neutral body compared to censorship-heavy services under the Meta brand. An epitome of what social engineering can achieve can be found in Internet Management Practices employed by Meta but also by Bytedance. And while TikTok claims to have distanced itself from its parents. Bytedance is closely associated with the Chinese Communist Party, which has strong anti-cannabis policies. So is social media censorship and technology a more subtle form of reefer madness?

Female nipples must be covered with a thin but transparent veil of clothing on Instagram. Of course, anyone who supports the #freethenipple movement might agree with this subtle lack of censorship. On the other hand, cannabis, joints and other smoking accessories on Tiktok have to be completely replaced with broccoli and pretzels. Oiud slang must be engineered to overcome the ban hammer’s algorithm. And, of course, there’s the torrent of “THC overconsumption” jokes—which can be a good laugh for many consumers, and is understandable. But why is some content not censored while scientists are regularly banned?

Let us know in the comments if you think social media censorship is tied to a modern reefer craze. Why do you think some posts about cannabis and psychedelics are censored while other content is more openly accepted?