Federal Cannabispolitik provides for new developments in research and beverage regulation

How we came here

The classification of cannabis as a substance I according to the law on controlled substances has long hindered the extensive examinations of its medical applications. This classification refers to substances with “non -accepted medical consumption” and a high potential for abuse, whereby cannabis is placed next to drugs such as heroin and MDMA. Nevertheless, numerous countries have legalized cannabis for medical and leisure use and created a separation between federal and state guidelines.

At the same time, the 2018 farm bill was legalized by Hanf-derived products that contained less than 0.3% DELTA-9 THC, which led to an increase in production and the sale of THC-infused drinks. These products have popular as alternatives to alcoholic beverages, which leads to discussions about their regulation and their space on the market.

Legislative efforts to facilitate cannabis research

In May 2025, representatives Dina Titus and Ilhan Omar introduced the evidence -based drug policy law of 2025 (EBDPA). This draft law aims to reduce the restrictions of the federal government in researching substances I., including cannabis. The most important provisions of the EBDPa include:

• Lift of the sections of the Office for the National Drug Control Policy in 1998, which prohibits that federal funds for research according to Appendix I substances are used.
• Removing mandates in which the office of national drug control policy has legalized all attempts to legalize substances for Annex I.

Proponents argue that the EBDPA would enable political decision -makers to create sound laws by enabling the research of areas such as youth consumption, health results and socio -economic effects of legalization of cannabis. While the legislation attracts non -partisan support in the cross -party support due to its focus on evidence -based politics, the current political climate presents its farewell.

The rise of the infused drinks

THC-energetic drinks that come from hemp were increased in the United States. States such as Minnesota and Hawaii have enacted laws that allow the sale of these drinks in places such as spirits shops. The attractiveness of THC drinks lies in their potential as alternatives to alcohol and offers consumers a different kind of social lubricant.

However, these drinks represent unique challenges:

• Delayed start: In contrast to alcohol, the effects of THC drinks can take an hour to manifest itself, which can affect their attractiveness in social environments.
• Taste and wording: Manufacturers are working to improve the taste profiles of these drinks in order to make them more tasty for a wider audience.
• Pricing: THC-infected drinks often have a higher price compared to conventional alcoholic beverages, which may restrict their market penetration.

When the market for these products grows, questions about their regulation arise, in particular with regard to the safety of security and their role in the potential exchange of alcohol in social contexts.