The legalization of marijuana is confronted with a new opposition in several US states

After years of expansion of legal access to marijuana, several US states now re -re -assess their cannabis policy. Legislators in states such as Idaho, Maryland, Michigan and New Jersey suggest measures to restrict the marijuana consumption, citing health concerns and financial considerations.

Idaho's legislative measures

Idaho, surrounded by states that have legalized marijuana, takes on a permanent attitude against legalization. The state representative Bruce Skaug supported two invoices: one that imposed a mandatory fine of $ 300 for the possession of marijuana, and another, which is intended to eliminate the possibility of legalization initiatives to legalize voters. Skaug argues that other states have not seen the promised advantages of legalization and have found that in other states that legalized marijuana, they have not improved their states to educate a family to do business. ”

Tax increases and THC caps

Officials in Maryland, Michigan and New Jersey, have proposed to increase marijuana taxes. In addition, health concerns in Colorado and Montana have considered to limit the mirrors of the tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the primary psychoactive component in cannabis, in products in pharmacies.

Challenges for medical marijuana programs

Some countries also aim at medical marijuana programs. In South Dakota, a draft law that would have significantly changed the medical marijuana program approved by the voter would have failed in the committee. Similarly, the legislators of Nebraska discuss the scope of the medical marijuana legalization, whereby considering that wide legalization could effectively lead to leisure use.

Public support remains constant

Despite these legislative efforts, public support for the legalization of marijuana remains strong. A PEW Research Center survey showed that 57% of the US -growing people believe that marijuana should be legal for both medical and leisure use. Proponents argue that recent legislative measures reflect political agendas rather than changes in public opinion.