The FBI announces that if you work 24 times after turning 18, you will not be able to work for the agency.

Cannabis users are wondering WTH?

The FBI recently announced that if you’re after age 18, you will

Why 24 times? Why not 12? What happens to people who are over 18 years old and smoke for 24 hours? Is there anything the government doesn’t tell us?

There was a reason the agency didn’t clarify its position on policy change – there is no logic behind it! It is a random number that shows people that they are “hip” and “there”. They’re progressive – unless they’re not.

The reason the FBI initially relaxed its cannabis use restrictions was because it had staffing issues.

In a recent article on Marijuana Moment, they sketched that former FBI director James Comey said, “I have to hire a great workforce to compete with these cybercriminals, and some of these kids want to smoke weed on their way to the interview.” said in 2014

Their problem was that the people skilled enough to stop cyber criminals tend to be big stoners. With their strict anti-cannabis stance, this meant they couldn’t hire talent due to their personal consumption choices.

In order to create legal leeway, they have shifted the acceptance threshold further and further to take account of the personnel issue – and after a few years they apparently came to the conclusion that 24 is the magic number to show whether someone is “fit” or not .

However, to fully understand this position, you need to understand the federal government’s position on drug use and “why” they are so adamant about banning people from all types of drugs – except, of course, the legal ones! Smoke as much tobacco and drink as much alcohol as you like!

Immigration policy guidelines shed light on the dark

The only reason the government is against cannabis use or any other “illegal drug use” is the same reason why someone applying for citizenship would be denied for admitting to smoking marijuana – even in places where it is legal is.

A policy warning in 2019 said the following:

“The US Citizenship and Immigration Service is issuing a policy to investigate violations of federal controlled substances law, including marijuana good moral character (GMC)”

Could this be the same reason aspiring FBI agents who smoke weed are banned from joining the agency?

You have this to say on the agency’s website;

“The FBI weighs the needs of the organization and the importance of maintaining the public integrity necessary to carry out its law enforcement and intelligence duties by recruiting the most qualified candidates.”

Again, we can conclude that the federal government believes that anyone who uses any “illegal substance” is of bad moral character.

However, if you drink alcohol or smoke tobacco or participate in the myriad of legal drugs, your moral character is somehow not changed. A better question, however, would be: Is it advisable for the United States government to legislate on morality?

However, some people think that government should enact morality – there is a difference between ethics and morality.

The government once tried to regulate morality – it was the first time it banned alcohol. This step was primarily morally motivated.

Here is a section of the Atlantic that explains this;

Prohibition came into effect in the United States a century ago and was celebrated by evangelical Protestants who had fought for 80 years to make it a reality. By ratifying the Eighteenth Amendment, which banned “the manufacture, sale, or transportation of intoxicating beverages” in the United States, they had achieved something that had not before or since achieved no movement: they had a new moral decree in the Constitution added. In doing so, they believed they had anchored Protestant virtue in American life and kept the country from decay – forever. – SOURCE

We know how that turned out. It was the only change in US history that was repealed.

The War on Drugs is also a morally motivated war, as the US government uses “drug use” as an indicator of “bad moral character”.

However, there is no scientific evidence to support this assumption. If this were true, then anyone who drinks alcohol would be technically “immoral” – since ethanol is a drug. Any tobacco user should be considered “immoral” for the same reasons.

Damn it – when you drink coffee you take the drug “caffeine” which – as Uncle Sam defines – should make you a person of “bad moral character”.

That’s not true, of course – the only reason “illegal drugs” are viewed as a measure of character is because of “illegality.” You have “bad moral character” because you break the law by using it.

But wasn’t it Thomas Jefferson who wrote; “When a law is unjust, a person not only has the right to disregard it, he is obliged to do so.”

Aren’t the war on drugs and the laws banning these so-called “illegal drugs” unjust laws? Then isn’t it your duty as an American to disobey them? Wouldn’t the use of drugs in this case be a judgment of “good moral character”?

Ask a minority how moral these laws are.

How moral is it to fine HSBC for laundering money from drug cartels and terrorist organizations (and recent crimes) while throwing cannabis dealers in jail for life for $ 20 for weed?

Nobody went to jail in the HSBC case.

We just have to ask; “Whose morality do we enact?”

The sticky ground

The FBI announces that people 18 years and older are “allowed” to get “high” 24 times without consequences, but the 25th time – for some magical reason they are no longer “fit for duty”.

All of this may sound ridiculous to any rational mind – that’s because it is!

At this point, the federal government seems to be mocking the people. By now it should be clear to anyone watching who the government serves – you certainly are not!

THE FBI IN THE CANNABIS INDUSTRY, READ MORE …

FBI SAYS MARIJUANA DEDICATIONS MAKE COMMUNITIES SAFE!

OR..

FBI LAUNCHES INVESTIGATION FOR NEVEDA LICENSES!